I chose this photo because it illustrates both depth of field and framing. I also thought of trying to use the objects in the photo as shapes in relation to each other, and it seemed to turn out well. I purposefully framed the shot so that as much as possible would be in focus, while most of the objects would be partially out of the frame (although the power line cutting through was not intentional, though I like it now). I like the strong shadows that the glaring sun is casting and the effect it made on the lens. I like that even though the sun is quite bright much of the sky is still exposed correctly. My aperture was as wide as it would go and my shutter speed was still fairly high because there was a good deal of light.
I chose this photo because it represents the opposite end of the spectrum regarding aperture. Only a few berries and part of a leaf are in focus, and the receding depth of field combined with the curved position of the berries give one a sense of motion. One person I showed the photo to commented "It's almost as if you could reach out and pick them!" Maybe that's why this photo is so appealing. When I was shooting these photos, I shot many with an even narrower aperture (1.8; this one is a bit wider) but this was my favorite.
This photo represents both depth of field and framing. I shot this with a very high f-stop and tried to frame it so as to make the most use of the symmetrical lines as possible. The vertical and horizontal lines combine with the light to draw your eye very clearly to the focal point directly in the center of the picture. Even the reference cards point your eyes towards the light.
I chose this photo because of the juxtaposition of blurred motion with a clean composition. There is a narrow depth of field, creating a distinction between the subject and the background even while the subject is obscured by a a blur similar to the blur of the background. I used a very slow shutter speed and panned but not at the same rate of speed as the subject was running so that he would still be blurry but not in the same way as the background.
This photo is interesting because of both depth of field and framing. I like how the landscape is continued in the reflections in the windows. I used a very wide aperture and focused so that both the background and the reflection would be in focus.
This photo illustrates depth of field, motion, and framing. I used a wide aperture and a slow shutter speed so that the people on the ground would be in blurry while the bricks would be sharp. The reflections in the window are what really drew me to this image; they create even more motion within the photograph because the shapes move your eyes around. The reflections (especially the blue one) also add to the framing of the photo and draw your eye to the three people and the three puddles in the center.
On the whole, I learned a lot about framing and focus from this shot. I learned that focusing on different parts of the scene can make completely different images. I also learned that shooting photos causes you to see things completely differently. I shot photos in the arboretum several different times, and the most recent time I got some really fun shots of a particular tree that I had never even noticed before. It makes you pay more attention to detail.
If I could have done this assignment again, I would have checked out a tripod and learned how to use it more so that camera shake wouldn't have been such a big problem and lack of light wouldn't have limited me so much.